People Waiting In Line
Key Point. A long friggin’ list. Kamala does not prioritize these folks because it’s not likely they’ll vote at all, let alone for the K-Gal. The American Dream does not appear in this article. This is about the downside of the recent Democrap (read the article, you are likely not one) regime. They warn you, “Don’t get out of line. We will setup gender/race campaign video meetings and let you know which ones you can attend.” Know now that staying in line is not enough. Using your freedom is not enough; must be demanded. US citizens believe the nation will protect at least their safety. That has not been true of late. Below are people who sit, wait, are forgotten, get bypassed in line by our President and his “wo/men.”
US citizens not transported in the airlift when Harris/Biden retreated from Afghanistan **
US citizens still in Afghanistan when Harris /Biden “turned the page” at the UN 5/21
US citizens killed and forgotten in the October 7 2013 Israel terrorist attack
US citizens captured and held hostage in Gaza by Hamas and killed or forgotten by Harris/Biden
US citizens abandoned in Haiti – these are mostly American aid workers… Good heart helpers
US citizens “at home in the US” neglected in Lahaina, Maui after the fire disaster
US citizens held in prison as political prisoners, such as WSJ Journalist in Russia
US citizens personally injured, raped, and killed by illegal aliens allowed US access
US veterans neglected for humanitarian aid when illegal aliens are provided for
US citizens who are homeless while illegals receive housing, food, health services
education, transportation, and cash
US citizens directly affected by illegal aliens inhabiting their neighborhoods
US citizens paying $100Bils per quarter to take care of illegal aliens – this may be low because it’s only $25k per alien per year without healthcare costs– $6,250/quarter
US citizens paying for illegal largess payments by Harris/Biden giving our money to pay college loans
US citizens unsafe in the streets an many neighborhoods due to illegal alien gangs
US Police Officers and Other Protectors abandoned from the top down by the Harris/Biden Administration and the Middle Out by Senators, Congresspersons, and Mayors – they know who they are, and you know who they are
US Military Personnel who go undefended and underdefended in war zones like the Middle East and in the Red Sea
US Individual Allies abandoned in Afghanistan instead of being imported to US
Applicants for citizenship to the US
Applicants for legal entry into the US
We tried to prioritize the above list, but there are too many number ones to do that.
That’s a Long Frigging List!! And it’s not complete! You are on it too!
** This was before Kamala and Joe “Turned the page on Afghanistan.” He never had a cajónes to be there, so he “stuck” US citizens with it, even the ones in that country.
The above constituents, which is not an exhaustive list, all rank below the 11 to 16 million illegal aliens – whatever name you choose to call them – who have been invited and escorted (by CBP staff members under orders) and been flown into US (also under Biden order) by our Vice President Kamala Harris.Think about it, just the fact that we don’t know the illegal alien total or any of the breakdowns to a reasonable amount is very telling about this process (there is another article coming about this).
4 And to Continue, something not to be taken for granted…:
Know what? You rank below illegal aliens too, because many of US Citizens do not get free health care, don’t get free K-12 education do not get free junior college tuition, do not get free food, clothing, housing, and transportation, and even cash money and loaded debit cards. If you’re one of 1M homeless US citizen or over 17M US veterans, you get none of these benefits; maybe you’ll receive medical, if you can hold your breath long enough.
Oh, and if you or I committed felonious and even aggravated crimes against persons, we would be aggressively prosecuted and likely imprisoned. Not so if you’re an illegal alien (see another article on California Bill 47, initiated and introduced by Kamalaty and eventually passed, that allows up to $1,000 in shoplifting Multiple Indefinite Times plus certain assaults without prosecution).
If you are reading this: you and your kids and their kids and those of everyone you know, are paying for these illegal aliens. You are borrowing money to pay for illegal aliens to be here using your rights for their benefit. This money is coming from your kids, whether you have them yet or not, or from others you know.
I can’t blame the aliens! If I could do that I would do it too! But I can’t; if I received these benefits I would be put in jail. Because I am a US Citizen. And I can’t go anywhere else to get them either, because no other country on earth is foolish or stupid enough, or corrupt enough, to allow these transgressions.
Now, here’s a thought about US census and not only America First, but AmericanS First. As you know, the country takes a census every decade to provide for, among other things, equalization of population to allocate Congresspersons in the House of Representatives.
Why’s this happening? Why‘s it happening now and did not happen before, particularly under Pres Trump? Because Kamalaty and all highly placed Democraps, plus lowly ones too I guess, want to grow the population inordinately by importing beholden eventual voters. Plus, they think they can influence the balance of demographics in the near future to give the Democraps the opportunity to swing the country. Remember to read the article about Democraps and why that word is out there, and you almost certainly, if you’re a Democrat, you are not a Democrap!
The Census is being brought up here because it directly relates to the rights and privileges of US citizens – the population.
The original text of the Enumeration Clause (a.ka. Census Clause, I.2.3.1), which has been the source of some controversy over time, is shown below. For the purposes of this article, some of these issues with the Clause will not be addressed here, but in another article. Certainly, we are not trying to avoid these controversial statements, just focusing here on the setbacks to US Citizens because we are not being treated – not any of US – like we are the primary concern of our executive leadership. US Citizens pay the taxes, earn the salaries, start the businesses, invent the improvements, provide all the local and state government employees, grow the crops, manufacture the products, drive the trucks, and serve and die in the military. Maybe not 100% of all this, but the bulk. For sure, we do most of the tax paying and serving and dying in the country. We also, at least up to now, do the voting too. US are supposed to gain the benefits of living in this country. I ask you, if you go to any other country in the world, do they let you have the rights of their citizens? Well, no. And… why should they? You can buy in, but you can’t walk in and nobody will fly you in. Except Kamalaty.
We have what’s known as a “Bicameral Legislature.” This means “two rooms.” One room is that each state is represented by two Senators, so we have 100 Senators who have half the law making power in the Congress. The other is each “slug” of citizens is represented by a Congressperson, or Representative. Now that slug of US changes over time as the population changes. We all know that our population has never decreased, so the average number of US citizens represented in this slug goes up over time. Right now the general average for each Representative is 760K persons in each of their districts. Each state gets at least one so that leaves 385 Representatives to allocate on a headcount basis, so the people have more or less equal voice in each passed law. The Senate allocation is not subject to much debate these days; so we’re focusing on the House side of the equation.
4 Now we’re into the nitty gritty of how Citizens are represented
So let’s just look at the way the Enumeration Clause starts out:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons… (and blah blah blah which as was said will be dealt with in another article)
Let’s break this down:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States…
What this indicates is the Framers (Creators of the Constitution) recognize there will be an allocation of Representatives and there will be some kinds of taxes, one of them being direct Taxes. Now, there is a term called apportionment, which is the calculation of how something can be distributed or collected. Remember that direct Taxes are the ones paid by the states to the Federal Government; it is up to the states, in general, to get that money to the national government each year. (we didn’t have personal Income Taxes then (!))
At this time, for people to be directly recognized legally by the new government, they had to be free Persons or guaranteed to be free within a certain time. Today, all US citizens are free Persons, but it didn’t start out that way. (This is one of the controversies we’ll deal with in another article.) But Freemen (Yes it was men then.) had rights and obligations. Just to be clear, and fair, that term today includes women and all human types however you want to parse them out. No type of human may be segmented out of free Persons by their intrinsic designation, but they may be due to their circumstance, situation, or history.
The right we’re discussing in this article is Representation. It is our contention that implicit in that right was that US citizens are Represented, and citizens may be subject to taxes and counted for the purposes of taxes. The Framers intentionally left this nomenclature somewhat vague anticipating future different interpretations and inclusion of other groups. This foresight was one of the factors in making the All-Important 14th Amendment possible. At the outset, one basic right, voting, was quite frequently linked to owning property. This is termed Franchisement or Being Enfranchised. Over time, business owners became eligible to vote, and then in the 1830s Andrew Jackson was instrumental in allowing occupations such as surveyors, hunters, trappers, and so forth in the expanding territories to become voters.
At no time in those days was it contemplated that people who were not citizens of the nation would be (a) voters or (b) represented in Congress.
1790–1800 basic headcount including sex.
1810 many more age categories.
1820 crosstabs for age and race, question about Foreigners who are non-naturalized.
1830 similar to 1820 with additional breakdown for free “colored” persons and ditto above.
1840 similar – pertinent here, the same question about non-naturalized Foreigners.
1850 – 1860 much more of an emphasis on origin of the individual or family.
Citizens (Native-Born Individuals):
Information about native-born citizens of the United States.
Native-born citizens: born within territorial boundaries of the United States/territories.
Demographic details, occupations, and other relevant information.
Noncitizens (Foreign-Born Individuals):
Captured data about foreign-born individuals residing in the United States.
Noncitizens: born outside the United States and had immigrated to the country.
Details, including country of birth, age, occupation, and other relevant information.
1870
One specific added question:
“Is the person a male citizen of the United States of 21 years or upwards?”
1900
Included a new multiple choice question: “Al” for alien, “Pa” for “first papers” (indicating that the person had started the naturalization process), “Na” for naturalized (“second papers”) if the person had completed the naturalization process and become a U.S. citizen.
1910
Added: Year of immigration to the US; Whether naturalized or Alien;
Able to speak English or language spoken.
1920
Quite a few innovative questions were added this year. These questions could be especially helpful given the current state of illegal crossings into US.
Until 1920, the citizenship question was only asked of adult men; now it applied to spouses/mothers as well.
Year of immigration to US, if applicable.
Naturalization status: as in 1900 Al, PA, Na.
Education: if attended school since Sept 1, 1919. In 2020, this could be a date in 2029.
Literacy: Whether the person could read and write (& language).
Place of birth; Mother tongue; Father’s place of birth and native language.
English proficiency: Whether the person could speak English.
1930
A few detailed questions were eliminated or summarized. An interesting note is that households were asked if they owned radios.
1940
Some of the earlier questions and codifications were retained. Should be noted this article is focusing on only the questions dealing with Representation in US.
1950
This census shortened the questionnaire significantly and certain of the citizenship questions were dropped. Two that were added or rephrased were:
Place of Birth: where was each person born (country/nation) and if foreign born, was this person naturalized – that is did they complete the work to attain citizenship.
1960
The omission of the citizenship question in 1960 was notable, especially considering that previous censuses had consistently asked about citizenship status from 1890 through 195012
1970
Citizenship Status: One question about citizenship appeared on the long-form: whether each individual was a US citizen. This information was collected to understand the demographic composition of the population1.
The long-form survey was later replaced by the American Community Survey (ACS), which has included a citizenship question since 2005. The ACS takes place every year and is the Census Bureau’s tool to make annual estimates used for government spending programs. The ACS includes a question whether someone is foreign-born and if they are a citizen2.
1980
Questions related to citizenship in the long-form questionnaire:
Place of Birth: where each person was born; if foreign-born, a follow-up question asked if the individual was naturalized (had completed the process of becoming a U.S. citizen)1.
Spanish or Hispanic Origin: For the first time, included a question on Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent. This question was asked of the entire population, not just a subset2.
If foreign, year of Entry into US.
1990
Place of Birth: State, U.S. commonwealth or territory, or named foreign country, to classify the population into two major groups: native (born in the United States) or foreign-born1.
92 percent of U.S. residents reported native; 8 percent reported foreign-born.
Citizenship Status: people were asked to mark whether citizens or noncitizens of the United States. Four categories of U US S citizenship were listed1:
Born abroad of American parents: Individuals born outside the U.S. having at least one American parent.
Naturalized citizen: Those who completed the process of becoming U.S. citizens.
Not a citizen: Noncitizens, including permanent residents (green card holders), temporary residents, and undocumented immigrants.
U.S. citizen by birth: Individuals born in the United States.
2000
Citizenship questions:
Place of Birth: State, U.S. commonwealth or territory, or foreign country where born. Classify the population: native (born in the United States) and foreign-born1.
92% U.S. residents were reported vs 8% reported foreign-born.
Citizenship Status: did not directly ask about citizenship status; long-form questionnaire, which was sent to a fraction of the population, included questions about place of birth and year of entry into the United States
The long-form survey was later replaced by the American Community Survey (ACS), which has included a citizenship question since . Unlike the decennial census, the ACS takes place every year and serves as the Census Bureau’s tool to make annual estimates used for government spending programs2.
The 2000 census did not directly ask about citizenship status; it did collect information related to place of birth.
2010
This census did not ask about citizenship1, unlike previous censuses.
The American Community Survey (ACS) continued to include the same citizenship question as 2005 and continues to do so1. The ACS is conducted annually2.
2020
The Supreme Court ruled against including a specific question about citizenship on the 2020 census form. The court found that while the government has the right to ask such a question, it needed to properly justify changing the long-standing practice of the Census Bureau. It was difficult for the Commerce Department to include the citizenship question in the census forms before printing, but it left the door open for future attempts2. The controversy surrounding this issue reflects the complexities of balancing accurate population counts with political implications3.
Let’s fast forward (too late for that) to today, where there are many and many more illegal aliens in the United States. Illegal and alien remains the legal legitimate nomenclature for this; is not insignificant that once again a set of “nicer words” is being introduced and pushed
“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers,
The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.” (Article I, Section 2, Clause 3)
This clause establishes the authority of Congress to conduct the census and outlines the purpose of determining representation in the House of Representatives based on free population. It also emphasizes the decennial nature of the census and grants Congress the power to determine how it should be conducted.
The position must meet Export Control compliance requirements, therefore a “US Person” as defined by 22 C.F.R. § 120.15 is required. “US Person” includes US Citizen, lawful permanent resident, refugee, or asylee. Employer willing to sponsor applicants for employment visa status.
Felons face varying restrictions on their rights based on the jurisdiction and the nature of their offenses. Here are some key points regarding felons’ rights in the United States:
Voting Rights: – Copilot
- Illegal Aliens: US immigration law is that entering the country at the border is prohibited except at one of the approx. 30 Ports of Entry. When arriving at points of entry you must have documents that indicate nation of origin. You must show you are in need of asylum for religious or political purposes. You must show that the US is the first nation you entered seeking asylum. Upon these proofs you are eligible to be detained waiting a hearing. If you do not have these proofs you are to be returned to your stated originating nation. This applies to individuals and to each individual of a family. This is a stripped down version of the law and there are many details.
- Automatic Restoration: In some states, voting rights are automatically restoredto some people convicted of a felony upon completion of their prison sentence, parole, or probation. For instance, New Mexico recently enacted legislation to restore voting rights automatically after prison time1.
- Case-by-Case Basis: In other states, voting rights are not automatically restored, but governors may choose to restore them through individual pardons. For example, Arizona automatically restores voting rights for one felony conviction, but government action is required for two or more convictions1.
- Lifetime Ban Ruled Unconstitutional: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that Mississippi’s lifetime voting ban for certain felonies was unconstitutional1.
- Other Rights:
- Civil Rights: Most jurisdictions curtail specific rights rather than all civil and constitutional rights for convicted felons. These include rights related to voting, holding public office, employment, domestic matters, and financial and contractual rights2.
- Firearm Possession: Some states restrict felons from possessing firearms.
- Immigration Consequences: Felony convictions can impact immigration status and the ability to remain in the United States3.
Some specifics vary by state.
Why do we have these provisions listed… They directly reflect the intent of the representation rights intended to Free People. Now, free people have the distinction of not being slaves or American Indians; that has changed over time.